ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 vaccines have a favorable safety profile in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) such as idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), however hesitancy continues to persist among these patients.Therefore, we studied the prevalence, predictors, and reasons for hesitancy in patients with IIMs, other AIRDs, non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs) and healthy controls (HCs), using data from the two international COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) e-surveys. METHODS: The 1st and 2nd COVAD patient self-reported e-surveys were circulated from March to December 2021, and February to June 2022 (ongoing). We collected data on demographics, comorbidities, COVID-19 infection and vaccination history, reasons for hesitancy, and patient reported outcomes. Predictors of hesitancy were analyzed using regression models in different groups. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 18,882 (COVAD-1) and 7666 (COVAD-2) respondents. Reassuringly, hesitancy decreased from 2021 (16.5%) to 2022 (5.1%) [OR 0.26; 95%CI: 0.24-0.30, p < 0.001]. However, concerns/fear over long-term safety had increased [OR 3.6;95% CI:2.9-4.6, p < 0.01].We noted with concern greater skepticism over vaccine science among patients with IIMs than AIRDs [OR:1.8; 95%CI: 1.08-3.2, p = 0.023] and HCs [OR: 4; 95%CI: 1.9-8.1, p < 0.001], as well as more long-term safety concerns/fear [IIMs vs AIRDs; OR: 1.9; 95%CI: 1.2-2.9, p = 0.001; IIMs vs HCs; OR: 5.4 95%CI: 3-9.6), p < 0.001].Caucasians [OR 4.2 (1.7-10.3)] were likely to be more hesitant, while those with better PROMIS physical health score were less hesitant [OR 0.9 (0.8-0.97)]. CONCLUSION: Vaccine hesitancy has decreased from 2021 to 2022, long-term safety concerns remain among patients with IIMs, particularly in Caucasians and those with poor physical function.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Disease flares in the post COVID-19 vaccination period represent a prominent concern, though risk factors are poorly understood. We studied these flares among patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). METHODS: The COVAD-1 and -2 global surveys were circulated in early 2021 and 2022 respectively, and we captured demographics, comorbidities, AIRDs details, COVID-19 infection history, and vaccination details.Flares of IIMs were defined as a. patient self-reported, b. immunosuppression (IS) denoted, c. clinical sign directed, and d. with >7.9-point MCID worsening of PROMISPF10a score. Risk factors of flares were analyzed using regression models. RESULTS: Of 15165 total respondents, 1278 IIMs (age 63 years, 70.3% female, 80.8% Caucasians), and 3453 AIRDs were included. Flares of IIM were seen in 9.6%, 12.7%, 8.7%, and 19.6% patients by definitions a-d respectively with a median time to flare of 71.5 (10.7-235) days, similar to AIRDs. Patients with active IIMs pre-vaccination (OR:1.2; 95%CI:1.03-1.6, p = 0.025) were prone to flares, while those receiving Rituximab (OR:0.3; 95%CI:0.1-0.7, p = 0.010) and Azathioprine (OR:0.3, 95%CI:0.1-0.8, p = 0.016) were at lower risk. Female gender and comorbidities predisposed to flares requiring changes in immunosuppression. Asthma (OR: 1.62; 95%CI: 1.05-2.50, p = 0.028) and higher pain VAS (OR: 1.19; 95%CI: 1.11-1.27, p < 0.001) were associated with disparity between self-reported and IS-denoted flares. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of IIMs confers an equal risk of flares in the post COVID-19 vaccination period to AIRDs, with active disease, female gender, and comorbidities conferring a higher risk. Disparity between patient and physician reported outcomes represents a future avenue for exploration.
ABSTRACT
The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines is understudied in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). We compared short-term adverse events (AEs) 7 days following vaccination in patients with SSc vs other rheumatic (AIRDs), non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs), and healthy controls (HCs). The COVID-19 Vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) self-reporting e-survey was circulated by a group of > 110 collaborators in 94 countries from March to December 2021. AEs were analyzed between different groups using regression models. Of 10,679 complete respondents [73.8% females, mean age 43 years, 53% Caucasians], 478 had SSc. 83% had completed two vaccine doses, Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) (51%) was the most common. Minor and major AEs were reported by 81.2% and 3.3% SSc patients, respectively, and did not differ significantly with disease activity or different vaccine types, though with minor symptom differences. Frequencies of AEs were not affected by background immunosuppression, though SSc patients receiving hydroxychloroquine experienced fatigue less commonly (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.8). Frequency of AEs and hospitalisations were similar to other AIRDs, nrAIDs, and HC except a higher risk of chills (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.7) and fatigue (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.6) compared to other AIRDs. COVID-19 vaccines were largely safe and well tolerated in SSc patients in the short term. Background immunosuppression and disease activity did not influence the vaccination-related short-term AEs.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Scleroderma, Systemic , Female , Humans , Adult , Male , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Self Report , Fatigue , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Flares of autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRDs) following COVID-19 vaccination are an outstanding concern in vaccine-hesitant individuals. Therefore, we investigated the incidence, predictors and patterns of flares following vaccination in individuals living with AIRDs using global COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) surveys. METHODS: The COVAD surveys were used to extract data on flare demographics, comorbidities, COVID-19 history, and vaccination details among patients with AIRDs. Flares following vaccination were identified as patient-reported(a), increased immunosuppression(b), clinical exacerbations(c) and worsening of PROMIS scores(d). We studied flare characteristics and used regression models to differentiate flares among various AIRDs. RESULTS: Of 15165 total responses, the incidence of flares in 3453 patients with AIRDs was 11.3%, 14.8%, 9.5%, and 26.7% by definitions a-d, respectively. There was moderate agreement between patient-reported and immunosuppression-defined flares (K = 0.403, p = 0.022). Arthritis (61.6%) and fatigue (58.8%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Self-reported flares were associated with higher comorbidities (p = 0.013), mental health disorders (MHD) (p < 0.001), and autoimmune multimorbidity (AIDm) (p < 0.001).In regression analysis, the presence of AIDm (OR = 1.4;95%CI:1.1-1.7;p=0.003), MHD (OR = 1.7;95%CI:1.1-2.6;p=0.007), and Moderna vaccine (OR = 1.5;95%CI:1.09-2.2;p=0.014) recipients were predictors of flares. Mycophenolate (OR = 0.5;95%CI:0.3-0.8;p=0.009) and glucocorticoids (OR = 0.6;95%CI:0.5-0.8;p=0.003) were protective.A higher frequency of patients with AIRDs reported overall active disease post-vaccination compared to before vaccination (OR = 1.3;95%CI:1.1-1.5;p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Flares occur in nearly one in ten individuals with AIRDs after COVID vaccination, with people with comorbidities, especially AID multimorbidity, mental health disorders and use of the Moderna vaccine being particularly vulnerable. Future avenues include exploring flare profiles and optimizing vaccine strategies for this group.
ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a significant change in the way healthcare is dispensed. During the pandemic, healthcare inequities were experienced by various sections of society, based on gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The LGBTQ individuals were also affected by this inequity. There is a lack of information on this topic especially in the developing countries. Hence this issue requires further exploration and understanding. Previous literature briefly explored the mental, physical, and emotional turmoil faced by the LGBTQ community on a regular basis. They feared rejection by family and friends, bullying, physical assault, and religious biases. These issues prevented them from publicly speaking about their sexual orientation thereby making it difficult to collect reliable data. Although they require medical and psychological treatment, they are afraid to ask for help and access healthcare and mental health services. Being mindful of these difficulties, this article explores the various underlying causes of the mental health problems faced by LGBTQ individuals, especially, in the Indian subcontinent. The article also examines the status of healthcare services available to Indian sexual minorities and provides recommendations about possible remedial measures to ensure the well-being of LGBTQ individuals.
ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a significant change in the way healthcare is dispensed. During the pandemic, healthcare inequities were experienced by various sections of society, based on gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The LGBTQ individuals were also affected by this inequity. There is a lack of information on this topic especially in the developing countries. Hence this issue requires further exploration and understanding. Previous literature briefly explored the mental, physical, and emotional turmoil faced by the LGBTQ community on a regular basis. They feared rejection by family and friends, bullying, physical assault, and religious biases. These issues prevented them from publicly speaking about their sexual orientation thereby making it difficult to collect reliable data. Although they require medical and psychological treatment, they are afraid to ask for help and access healthcare and mental health services. Being mindful of these difficulties, this article explores the various underlying causes of the mental health problems faced by LGBTQ individuals, especially, in the Indian subcontinent. The article also examines the status of healthcare services available to Indian sexual minorities and provides recommendations about possible remedial measures to ensure the well-being of LGBTQ individuals.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 vaccinations have been proven to be generally safe in healthy populations. However, the data on the vaccine safety in patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is inadequate. The study aimed to evaluate the frequency and severity of the adverse vaccination effects (ADEs) and their risk factors among T1DM patients. Methods: This study analyzed data from the COVID-19 vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) survey database (May-Dec 2021;110 collaborators, 94 countries), comparing COVID-19 vaccine adverse drug events among T1DM patients and healthy controls (HCs). The study was designed to assess post-COVID-19 vaccination ADE in patients with autoimmune diseases. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed based on data distribution and variable types. Results: We included 5480 completed responses in this study. Of all responses, 5408 were HCs, and 72 were T1DM patients (43 females, 48.0% Caucasians). The majority of the respondents had received Pfizer vaccines (p < 0.001). 4052/5480 (73.9%) respondents had received 2 vaccine doses, rest had received 1 vaccine dose. The most common ADE reported was injection site pain (50.0%), with T1DM patients reporting significantly lower frequency of injection site pain than HCs [OR 0.6 (0.3-0.9), p = 0.045]. Multivariate analysis showed that T1DM respondents had higher frequency of severe skin rashes [OR = 8.0 (1.7-36.0), p = 0.007] than HCs. However, overall ADEs, major ADEs, minor ADE and hospitalization frequency remained similar between T1DM and HCs. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination was largely safe and well tolerated in patients with T1DM with similar ADE profile compared to HCs, except for increased frequency of skin rashes in them.